[Seattle-SAGE] To be, or not to be: Seattle LOPSA
atom.powers at gmail.com
Thu Dec 29 10:43:13 PST 2005
On 12/28/05, Scott McDermott <scottm at octaldream.com> wrote:
> So, that's the really condensed version. I'd like to take a vote from
> those who read this far (please just reply directly to me if you choose
> to vote), do we:
> A) Stick with SAGE
> B) Affiliate with LOPSA
> C) Don't care as long as things stay about the same
> If we affiliate with LOPSA, do we just become the Seattle LOPSA Group,
> Seattle LOPSA, or something else?
> Scott McDermott
SLOPSAG has a certian ... ring to it.
Why would we want to become a SLOPSA group?
Perfection is just a word I use occasionally with mustard.
More information about the Members