[Seattle-SAGE] To be, or not to be: Seattle LOPSA'
benjamin at seattlefenix.net
Thu Dec 29 11:19:36 PST 2005
* Atom Powers (atom.powers at gmail.com) [051229 10:56]:
> On 12/28/05, Scott McDermott <scottm at octaldream.com> wrote:
> > So, that's the really condensed version. I'd like to take a vote from
> > those who read this far (please just reply directly to me if you choose
> > to vote), do we:
> > A) Stick with SAGE
> > B) Affiliate with LOPSA
> > C) Don't care as long as things stay about the same
> > If we affiliate with LOPSA, do we just become the Seattle LOPSA Group,
> > Seattle LOPSA, or something else?
> > --
> > Scott McDermott
> SLOPSAG has a certian ... ring to it.
> Why would we want to become a SLOPSA group?
> Perfection is just a word I use occasionally with mustard.
> --Atom Powers--
What do we lose if we leave SAGE? How much momentum does the LOPSA group? Is this just a small group who will have trouble getting users to come over from SAGE, or are people switching over in droves?
SysAdmin, CarDomain Network
92 Toyota Turbo MR2, the fun car
78 Datsun B-210, 2000lb project car
91 Geo Prizm, the beater that just won't die
More information about the Members