[Seattle-SAGE] To be, or not to be: Seattle LOPSA'

Benjamin Krueger benjamin at seattlefenix.net
Thu Dec 29 11:19:36 PST 2005


* Atom Powers (atom.powers at gmail.com) [051229 10:56]:
> On 12/28/05, Scott McDermott <scottm at octaldream.com> wrote:
> > So, that's the really condensed version. I'd like to take a vote from
> > those who read this far (please just reply directly to me if you choose
> > to vote), do we:
> >
> > A) Stick with SAGE
> > B) Affiliate with LOPSA
> > C) Don't care as long as things stay about the same
> >
> > If we affiliate with LOPSA, do we just become the Seattle LOPSA Group,
> > Seattle LOPSA, or something else?
> >
> > --
> > Scott McDermott
> >
> 
> 
> SLOPSAG has a certian ... ring to it.
> 
> Why would we want to become a SLOPSA group?
> Advantages?
> Disadvantages?
> 
> --
> --
> Perfection is just a word I use occasionally with mustard.
> --Atom Powers--

What do we lose if we leave SAGE? How much momentum does the LOPSA group? Is this just a small group who will have trouble getting users to come over from SAGE, or are people switching over in droves?

-- 
Benjamin Krueger
SysAdmin, CarDomain Network
92 Toyota Turbo MR2, the fun car
78 Datsun B-210, 2000lb project car
91 Geo Prizm, the beater that just won't die



More information about the Members mailing list