[SASAG] Virtualizing MS Windows

Atom Powers atom.powers at gmail.com
Fri Jun 8 09:35:11 PDT 2007


On 6/7/07, Atom Powers <atom.powers at gmail.com> wrote:
> Much to my dismay, the number of MS Windows only services that I need
> to support seems to be growing. Most of them are fairly low-load but
> because of the nature of MS Windows applications I would like to
> dedicate a server for each application. Obviously purchasing a server
> for each service is very inefficient.

So far: six endorsements for VMware, two for MS Virtual Server, and
one mention of Xen.

>From the responses VMware seems like the right choice for me. It's
"free" because I have only a few, low-load, applications so I don't
need to purchase the Enterprise version.

On the other side of that knuckle, running virtual MS Windows on MS
Windows seems to me like a bad idea. If the goal is to secure against
a MS Windows crash or security problem, making the underlying OS MS
Windows doesn't gain you anything.

Thank you all for your sage advice.

-- 
--
Perfection is just a word I use occasionally with mustard.
--Atom Powers--



More information about the Members mailing list